↓ Skip to main content

The association between dermoscopic features and BRAF mutational status in cutaneous melanoma: Significance of the blue-white veil

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The association between dermoscopic features and BRAF mutational status in cutaneous melanoma: Significance of the blue-white veil
Published in
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miquel Armengot-Carbó, Eduardo Nagore, Zaida García-Casado, Rafael Botella-Estrada

Abstract

The genetic basis of melanoma affects its clinicopathological characteristics and increasingly influences its management. BRAF-mutated melanoma may present with specific dermoscopic features. To identify the dermoscopic features associated with BRAF mutation in cutaneous melanoma and to evaluate a model capable of predicting BRAF mutations based on dermoscopic and clinicopathological features easily accessible in normal clinical practice. A prospective, cross-sectional, observational, and descriptive study was performed. Ninety-three cutaneous melanomas with dermoscopic images from 93 patients were included. BRAF mutational status was determined by genetic analysis using two methods: cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test and Sanger sequencing. Clinicopathological data were collected; dermoscopic images were analyzed by two independent blind observers. Blue-white veil in dermoscopy was significantly associated with BRAF mutations (OR: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.6-11.5; p=0.003). Patients with BRAF-mutated melanomas were significantly younger than those with wild-type melanomas (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93-0.99; p=0.008). Based on these two variables, it was possible to predict BRAF mutational status in melanoma with 73% accuracy. Histological data were obtained from pathology reports. The accuracy of the predictive model has not been tested with a new dataset. Blue-white veil in dermoscopy is associated with BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Other 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,989,045
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#6,953
of 10,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,225
of 450,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
#116
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.