↓ Skip to main content

Regional myocadial blood flow and cardiac mechanics in dog hearts with CO2 laser-induced intramyocardial revascularization

Overview of attention for article published in Basic Research in Cardiology, March 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
45 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Regional myocadial blood flow and cardiac mechanics in dog hearts with CO2 laser-induced intramyocardial revascularization
Published in
Basic Research in Cardiology, March 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf01906971
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. I. Hardy, F. W. James, R. W. Millard, S. Kaplan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 40%
Unspecified 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Engineering 2 20%
Sports and Recreations 2 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Basic Research in Cardiology
#182
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,550
of 15,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic Research in Cardiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them