↓ Skip to main content

Planarity recognition of large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by various octadecylsilica stationary phases in non-aqueous reversed-phase liquid chromatography

Overview of attention for article published in Chromatographia, April 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
19 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Planarity recognition of large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by various octadecylsilica stationary phases in non-aqueous reversed-phase liquid chromatography
Published in
Chromatographia, April 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf02321270
Authors

K. Jinno, S. Shimura, N. Tanaka, K. Kimata, J. C. Fetzer, W. R. Biggs

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2006.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Chromatographia
#138
of 1,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,074
of 14,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromatographia
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,028 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.