↓ Skip to main content

Experimental and analytical analysis of pretensioned inverted T-beam with circular web openings

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Experimental and analytical analysis of pretensioned inverted T-beam with circular web openings
Published in
International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, March 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10999-009-9096-4
Authors

Hock Tian Cheng, Bashar S. Mohammed, Kamal Nasharuddin Mustapha

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 40%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design
#4
of 21 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,937
of 93,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them