| Title |
Comparative study between botulinum toxin injection and partial division of puborectalis for treating anismus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00384-008-0609-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed Farid, Tamer Youssef, Tarek Mahdy, Waleed Omar, Hesham Abdul Moneim, Ayman El_Nakeeb, Mohamed Youssef |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2010.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#393
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,735
of 165,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Colorectal Disease
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them