You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
American Gut: an Open Platform for Citizen Science Microbiome Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
mSystems, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1128/msystems.00031-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel McDonald, Embriette Hyde, Justine W. Debelius, James T. Morton, Antonio Gonzalez, Gail Ackermann, Alexander A. Aksenov, Bahar Behsaz, Caitriona Brennan, Yingfeng Chen, Lindsay DeRight Goldasich, Pieter C. Dorrestein, Robert R. Dunn, Ashkaan K. Fahimipour, James Gaffney, Jack A. Gilbert, Grant Gogul, Jessica L. Green, Philip Hugenholtz, Greg Humphrey, Curtis Huttenhower, Matthew A. Jackson, Stefan Janssen, Dilip V. Jeste, Lingjing Jiang, Scott T. Kelley, Dan Knights, Tomasz Kosciolek, Joshua Ladau, Jeff Leach, Clarisse Marotz, Dmitry Meleshko, Alexey V. Melnik, Jessica L. Metcalf, Hosein Mohimani, Emmanuel Montassier, Jose Navas-Molina, Tanya T. Nguyen, Shyamal Peddada, Pavel Pevzner, Katherine S. Pollard, Gholamali Rahnavard, Adam Robbins-Pianka, Naseer Sangwan, Joshua Shorenstein, Larry Smarr, Jin Song, Timothy Spector, Austin D. Swafford, Varykina G. Thackray, Luke R. Thompson, Anupriya Tripathi, Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza, Alison Vrbanac, Paul Wischmeyer, Elaine Wolfe, Qiyun Zhu, Allison E. Mann, Amnon Amir, Angel Frazier, Cameron Martino, Carlito Lebrilla, Catherine Lozupone, Cecil M. Lewis, Charles Raison, Chi Zhang, Christian L. Lauber, Christina Warinner, Christopher A. Lowry, Chris Callewaert, Cinnamon Bloss, Dana Willner, Daniela Domingos Galzerani, David J. Gonzalez, David A. Mills, Deepak Chopra, Dirk Gevers, Donna Berg-Lyons, Dorothy D. Sears, Doug Wendel, Elijah Lovelace, Emily Pierce, Emily TerAvest, Evan Bolyen, Frederic D. Bushman, Gary D. Wu, George M. Church, Gordon Saxe, Hanna D. Holscher, Ivo Ugrina, J. Bruce German, J. Gregory Caporaso, Jacob M. Wozniak, Jacqueline Kerr, Jacques Ravel, James D. Lewis, Jan S. Suchodolski, Janet K. Jansson, Jarrad T. Hampton-Marcell, Jason Bobe, Jeroen Raes, John H. Chase, Jonathan A. Eisen, Jonathan Monk, Jose C. Clemente, Joseph Petrosino, Julia Goodrich, Julia Gauglitz, Julian Jacobs, Karsten Zengler, Kelly S. Swanson, Kim Lewis, Kris Mayer, Kyle Bittinger, Lindsay Dillon, Livia S. Zaramela, Lynn M. Schriml, Maria G. Dominguez-Bello, Marta M. Jankowska, Martin Blaser, Meg Pirrung, Michael Minson, Mike Kurisu, Nadim Ajami, Neil R. Gottel, Nicholas Chia, Noah Fierer, Owen White, Patrice D. Cani, Pawel Gajer, Philip Strandwitz, Purna Kashyap, Rachel Dutton, Rachel S. Park, Ramnik J. Xavier, Robert H. Mills, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown, Ruth Ley, Sarah M. Owens, Scott Klemmer, Sébastien Matamoros, Siavash Mirarab, Stephanie Moorman, Susan Holmes, Tara Schwartz, Tifani W. Eshoo-Anton, Tim Vigers, Vineet Pandey, Will Van Treuren, Xin Fang, Zhenjiang Zech Xu, Alan Jarmusch, Justin Geier, Nicolai Reeve, Ricardo Silva, Evguenia Kopylova, Dominic Nguyen, Karenina Sanders, Rodolfo Antonio Salido Benitez, Arthur Cole Heale, Max Abramson, Jérôme Waldispühl, Alexander Butyaev, Chris Drogaris, Elena Nazarova, Madeleine Ball, Beau Gunderson, Rob Knight |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 328 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 108 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 9% |
| Canada | 13 | 4% |
| Spain | 9 | 3% |
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| India | 4 | 1% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 107 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 187 | 57% |
| Scientists | 94 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 41 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 768 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 768 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 119 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 115 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 85 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 80 | 10% |
| Other | 38 | 5% |
| Other | 130 | 17% |
| Unknown | 201 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 119 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 46 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 5% |
| Other | 146 | 19% |
| Unknown | 227 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#12,820
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from mSystems
#1
of 1,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221
of 342,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from mSystems
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.