| Title |
Transcription, splicing and editing of plastid RNAs in the nonphotosynthetic plant Epifagus virginiana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Molecular Biology, November 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00041163 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie C. Ems, Clifford W. Morden, Colleen K. Dixon, Kenneth H. Wolfe, Claude W. de Pamphilis, Jeffrey D. Palmer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 26% |
| Researcher | 11 | 23% |
| Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2002.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#983
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,407
of 25,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#23
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.