↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of a positive selection technique using an avidin column to isolate human peripheral blood T cell subsets

Overview of attention for article published in Immunotechnology, October 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of a positive selection technique using an avidin column to isolate human peripheral blood T cell subsets
Published in
Immunotechnology, October 1994
DOI 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90367-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurie S. Davis, Melissa J. McIlraith, Trang Paecheo, Brent Becker, Leah M. Adix, Ranjeny Thomas, Mary C. Wacholtz, Peter E. Lipsky

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Immunotechnology
#1,931
of 4,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,386
of 20,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunotechnology
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,816 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.