↓ Skip to main content

Structure of potassium channels

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
620 Mendeley
Title
Structure of potassium channels
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00018-015-1948-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qie Kuang, Pasi Purhonen, Hans Hebert

Abstract

Potassium channels ubiquitously exist in nearly all kingdoms of life and perform diverse but important functions. Since the first atomic structure of a prokaryotic potassium channel (KcsA, a channel from Streptomyces lividans) was determined, tremendous progress has been made in understanding the mechanism of potassium channels and channels conducting other ions. In this review, we discuss the structure of various kinds of potassium channels, including the potassium channel with the pore-forming domain only (KcsA), voltage-gated, inwardly rectifying, tandem pore domain, and ligand-gated ones. The general properties shared by all potassium channels are introduced first, followed by specific features in each class. Our purpose is to help readers to grasp the basic concepts, to be familiar with the property of the different domains, and to understand the structure and function of the potassium channels better.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 620 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 615 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 120 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 117 19%
Student > Master 72 12%
Researcher 40 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 6%
Other 70 11%
Unknown 161 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 150 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 14%
Neuroscience 58 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 38 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 6%
Other 83 13%
Unknown 166 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,591,533
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,602
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,096
of 266,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#23
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.