| Title |
Simulation of FY-2D infrared brightness temperature and sensitivity analysis to the errors of WRF simulated cloud variables
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Earth Sciences, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11430-017-9150-0 |
| Authors |
Xiaokang Shi, Yaodong Li, Jianwen Liu, Xizi Xiang, Le Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 43% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 29% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,450,539
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Science China Earth Sciences
#68
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,793
of 335,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Earth Sciences
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.