↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding: I. Parallel development and coding of neural feature detectors

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, September 1976
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1616 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding: I. Parallel development and coding of neural feature detectors
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, September 1976
DOI 10.1007/bf00344744
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Grossberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 218 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 25%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Master 29 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 51 21%
Unknown 34 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 60 25%
Engineering 38 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 12%
Psychology 23 9%
Neuroscience 15 6%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 46 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#188
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,125
of 4,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them