↓ Skip to main content

Identification of the pocket factors in a picornavirus

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Identification of the pocket factors in a picornavirus
Published in
Archives of Virology, May 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00705-002-0974-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Smyth, T. Pettitt, A. Symonds, J. Martin

Abstract

Bovine enterovirus (BEV), along with other enteroviruses and the rhinoviruses, has a hydrophobic pocket within structural protein VP1. In the crystal structures of these viruses there is electron density commensurate with a non-protein molecule within the pocket. These molecules, termed pocket factors, have been shown to stabilise the capsid and their removal from the pocket is a necessary prerequisite to uncoating. The pocket factors have been proposed, from the electron densities and uncoating studies, to be short chain fatty acids. In order to identify the pocket factor of BEV, we have grown and purified the virus in an identical manner to that used for the crystal structure determination and have performed a lipophilic extraction. Palmitic acid, C(16:0), was the most abundant accounting for 40.8% by mass of the lipophilic extract (39.3 mol%). Myristic acid C(14:0), was next most abundant at 18.5% by mass (20.0 mol%). In addition, we have identified other fatty acids in smaller proportions. We have therefore shown that BEV contains saturated fatty acid pocket factors of varying chain length. We have also compared the profile of the fatty acyl chain composition of BEV with those for uninfected BHK-21 cell plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum extracts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 33%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,701,487
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#378
of 4,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,378
of 50,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,158 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.