| Title |
Restoring seaweeds: does the declining fucoid Phyllospora comosa support different biodiversity than other habitats?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-013-0158-5 |
| Authors |
E. M. Marzinelli, A. H. Campbell, A. Vergés, M. A. Coleman, B. P. Kelaher, P. D. Steinberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 22% |
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 28% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,461,241
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#495
of 2,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,461
of 210,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,557 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.