| Title |
Satiation in an evolutionary model of structural economic dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, January 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/pl00003852 |
| Authors |
Esben Sloth Andersen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 33% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#124
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,247
of 114,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.