↓ Skip to main content

A Comprehensive Review of Tourette Syndrome and Complementary Alternative Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Current Developmental Disorders Reports, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 167)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
A Comprehensive Review of Tourette Syndrome and Complementary Alternative Medicine
Published in
Current Developmental Disorders Reports, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40474-018-0137-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashutosh Kumar, L. Duda, G. Mainali, S. Asghar, D. Byler

Abstract

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neuropsychiatric condition defined by both motor and phonic tics over a period of at least 1 year with the onset before 18 years of age. The purpose of this article is to review the use of complementary alternative medicine (CAM) in children and adults with Tourette syndrome with emphasis on recent research. Most patients do not tell their physician about the use of CAM unless if specifically asked. Of the studies reviewed, description of the treatment and the frequency of use were most often reported. Few studies examine the role or effectiveness of CAM in the treatment of TS specifically. Practitioners should be aware of current research regarding various CAM modalities used for TS patients, including efficacy, potential adverse effects, and interactions with medications. Robust data about the use of CAM, efficacy, and potential side effects is lacking and requires further research to clarify optimal use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 23%
Other 4 15%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Psychology 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,176,907
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from Current Developmental Disorders Reports
#17
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,925
of 331,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Developmental Disorders Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them