Title |
Using quantitative electron microscopy for process mineralogy applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
JOM, April 2000
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11837-000-0126-9 |
Authors |
P. Gottlieb, G. Wilkie, D. Sutherland, E. Ho-Tun, S. Suthers, K. Perera, B. Jenkins, S. Spencer, A. Butcher, J. Rayner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 168 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 26% |
Researcher | 41 | 23% |
Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 14% |
Unknown | 29 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 73 | 42% |
Engineering | 30 | 17% |
Chemical Engineering | 8 | 5% |
Materials Science | 8 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#76
of 1,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,865
of 41,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them