↓ Skip to main content

Multistage wet grinding of talc: relation between physico-chemical parameters of the filler and mechanical properties of filled polypropylenes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, January 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Multistage wet grinding of talc: relation between physico-chemical parameters of the filler and mechanical properties of filled polypropylenes
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, January 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00595758
Authors

L. J. Michot, F. Villieras, J. Yvon, G. Fourty

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 33%
Materials Science 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2002.
All research outputs
#4,764,957
of 23,053,613 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#295
of 4,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,980
of 65,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#4
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.