↓ Skip to main content

Plant growth-inhibitory pseudomonads colonizing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots

Overview of attention for article published in Plant and Soil, February 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Plant growth-inhibitory pseudomonads colonizing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots
Published in
Plant and Soil, February 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf02197867
Authors

L. F. Elliott, J. M. Lynch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 67%
Researcher 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 1991.
All research outputs
#5,032,776
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#462
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,670
of 39,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.