↓ Skip to main content

Valid screening questions useful to diagnose hand and forearm eczema are available in the Spanish language, a new tool for global research

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Dermatology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Valid screening questions useful to diagnose hand and forearm eczema are available in the Spanish language, a new tool for global research
Published in
European Journal of Dermatology, June 2015
DOI 10.1684/ejd.2014.2485
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Martí-Margarit, Josep M. Manresa, Mike Herdman, Ramon Pujol, Consol Serra, Mary-Ann Flyvholm, Ana M. Giménez-Arnau

Abstract

Hand eczema is an impacting cutaneous disease. Globally valid tools that help to diagnose hand and forearm eczema are required. To validate the questions to detect hand and/or forearm eczema included in the "Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire" (NOSQ-2002) in the Spanish language. A prospective pilot study was conducted with 80 employees of a cleaning company and a retrospective one involving 2,546 individuals. The responses were analysed for sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. The final diagnosis according to the patients' hospital records, the specialty care records and the physical examination was taken as gold standard. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was also evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity, in a worst case scenario (WC) combining both questions, were 96.5% and 66.7%, respectively, and in a per protocol (PP) analysis, were 96.5% and 75.2%. The questions validated detected eczema effectively, making this tool suitable for use e.g. in multicentre epidemiological studies or clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 71%
Environmental Science 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Dermatology
#344
of 720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,662
of 278,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Dermatology
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.