↓ Skip to main content

Sparse canonical correlation analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Machine Learning, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
Title
Sparse canonical correlation analysis
Published in
Machine Learning, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10994-010-5222-7
Authors

David R. Hardoon, John Shawe-Taylor

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Finland 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 254 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 29%
Researcher 47 17%
Student > Master 37 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 41 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 86 30%
Mathematics 33 12%
Engineering 26 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 7%
Neuroscience 14 5%
Other 52 18%
Unknown 51 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,557,690
of 23,053,613 outputs
Outputs from Machine Learning
#281
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,289
of 100,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Learning
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them