| Title |
Fast parameter calibration of a cardiac electromechanical model from medical images based on the unscented transform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10237-012-0446-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stéphanie Marchesseau, Hervé Delingette, Maxime Sermesant, Nicholas Ayache |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 54 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#122
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,152
of 174,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.