↓ Skip to main content

The influence of reperfusion on infarct size after experimental coronary artery occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in Basic Research in Cardiology, July 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The influence of reperfusion on infarct size after experimental coronary artery occlusion
Published in
Basic Research in Cardiology, July 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf01907838
Authors

M. Hofmann, Mechthild Hofmann, K. Genth, W. Schaper

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 1990.
All research outputs
#7,557,690
of 23,053,613 outputs
Outputs from Basic Research in Cardiology
#182
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,707
of 6,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic Research in Cardiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them