↓ Skip to main content

Haptics-based virtual reality periodontal training simulator

Overview of attention for article published in Virtual Reality, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Haptics-based virtual reality periodontal training simulator
Published in
Virtual Reality, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10055-009-0112-7
Authors

Cristian Luciano, Pat Banerjee, Thomas DeFanti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 4%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Computer Science 21 19%
Engineering 18 17%
Psychology 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,557,690
of 23,053,613 outputs
Outputs from Virtual Reality
#123
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,483
of 173,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virtual Reality
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.