↓ Skip to main content

Metamemory Experiments in Neurological Populations: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Metamemory Experiments in Neurological Populations: A Review
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, September 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11065-005-7091-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jasmeet K. Pannu, Alfred W. Kaszniak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
France 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 217 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 24%
Student > Master 38 16%
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 26 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 128 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 34 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#268
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,861
of 69,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them