| Title |
Lobbying and transparency: A comparative analysis of regulatory reform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Interest Groups & Advocacy, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1057/iga.2012.4 |
| Authors |
Craig Holman, William Luneburg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 47 | 42% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,175,748
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Interest Groups & Advocacy
#54
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,585
of 160,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interest Groups & Advocacy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them