You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Density and home range of feral cats in north-western Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Research, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1071/wr14180 |
| Authors |
McGregor Hugh W., Sarah Legge, Joanne Potts, Menna E. Jones, Christopher N. Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 43% |
| Thailand | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 23% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 42 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,561,945
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#230
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,798
of 279,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.