| Title |
Assessment of NIR spectroscopy for nondestructive analysis of physical and chemical attributes of sulfamethazine bolus dosage forms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AAPS PharmSciTech, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1208/pt060115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aditya S. Tatavarti, Raafat Fahmy, Huiquan Wu, Ajaz S. Hussain, William Marnane, Dennis Bensley, Gary Hollenbeck, Stephen W. Hoag |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 30% |
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 11 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#502
of 1,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,158
of 70,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.