| Title |
Comparison of isokinetic and isoinertial lifting tests as predictors of maximal lifting capacity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00640654 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ira Jacobs, Douglas G. Bell, Jan Pope |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 36% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 36% |
| Engineering | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 1992.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,159
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,613
of 12,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.