↓ Skip to main content

Structure and function ofdnaQ andmutD mutators ofEscherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, October 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Structure and function ofdnaQ andmutD mutators ofEscherichia coli
Published in
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, October 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02428026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyoko Takano, Yusaku Nakabeppu, Hisaji Maki, Takashi Horiuchi, Mutsuo Sekiguchi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Engineering 4 19%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#920
of 3,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,070
of 10,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#12
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.