↓ Skip to main content

Factors affecting transient gene expression in electroporated black spruce (Picea mariana) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) protoplasts

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, October 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Factors affecting transient gene expression in electroporated black spruce (Picea mariana) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) protoplasts
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, October 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00290838
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. E. Tautorus, F. Bekkaoui, M. Pilon, R. S. S. Datla, W. L. Crosby, L. C. Fowke, D. I. Dunstan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Energy 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2002.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,366
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,248
of 15,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.