Title |
Plant protoplast fusion and growth of intergeneric hybrid cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Planta, January 1974
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00390290 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
K. N. Kao, F. Constabel, M. R. Michayluk, O. L. Gamborg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Kenya | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 56% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,765,044
of 23,053,613 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#210
of 2,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#929
of 18,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,613 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.