| Title |
Chemical modification of carbon nanotubes and preparation of polystyrene/carbon nanotubes composites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Macromolecular Research, August 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03218416 |
| Authors |
Hyeong Taek Ham, Chong Min Koo, Sang Ouk Kim, Yeong Suk Choi, In Jae Chung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 35% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 10 | 32% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 23% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Macromolecular Research
#68
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,552
of 61,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Macromolecular Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them