| Title |
2-Deoxyglucose as a selective agent for derepressed mutants of Pichia stipitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, January 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1385/abab:77:1-3:211 |
| Authors |
Hassan K. Sreenath, Thomas W. Jeffries |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2002.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#594
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,657
of 109,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.