You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Novel Inhibitor Cystine Knot Peptides from Momordica charantia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0075334 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wen-Jun He, Lai Yue Chan, Richard J. Clark, Jun Tang, Guang-Zhi Zeng, Octavio L. Franco, Cinzia Cantacessi, David J. Craik, Norelle L. Daly, Ning-Hua Tan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,877
of 194,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,039
of 209,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,135
of 5,120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.