↓ Skip to main content

Advances and applications on microfluidic velocimetry techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Advances and applications on microfluidic velocimetry techniques
Published in
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10404-010-0588-1
Authors

Stuart J. Williams, Choongbae Park, Steven T. Wereley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 3%
China 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 141 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 27%
Researcher 32 21%
Student > Master 22 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 78 50%
Physics and Astronomy 18 12%
Chemical Engineering 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Materials Science 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 23 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,557,690
of 23,053,613 outputs
Outputs from Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
#129
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,804
of 95,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,613 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.