You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Computational modeling of biochemical networks using COPASI.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 2 |
| Book title |
Systems Biology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-59745-525-1_2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-934115-64-0, 978-1-59745-525-1
|
| Authors |
Mendes P, Hoops S, Sahle S, Gauges R, Dada J, Kummer U, Mendes, Pedro, Hoops, Stefan, Sahle, Sven, Gauges, Ralph, Dada, Joseph, Kummer, Ursula, Pedro Mendes, Stefan Hoops, Sven Sahle, Ralph Gauges, Joseph Dada, Ursula Kummer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Latvia | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 152 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 9% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,319
of 13,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,515
of 170,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#62
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.