| Title |
On associative memory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, February 1980
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00337019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Palm |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 20% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 38 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 16% |
| Psychology | 12 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 8% |
| Engineering | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#188
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,790
of 27,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.