↓ Skip to main content

Tuning Liposome Membrane Permeability by Competitive Coiled Coil Heterodimerization and Heterodimer Exchange

Overview of attention for article published in Langmuir, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tuning Liposome Membrane Permeability by Competitive Coiled Coil Heterodimerization and Heterodimer Exchange
Published in
Langmuir, May 2018
DOI 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00592
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camilla Skyttner, Karin Enander, Christopher Aronsson, Daniel Aili

Abstract

Membrane active peptides that enable triggered release of liposomal cargo is of large interest for development of liposome-based drug delivery systems but require peptide-lipid membrane interactions that are highly defined and tunable. To this end, we have explored the possibility to use the competing interactions between membrane partitioning and heterodimerization and folding of a set of four different de novo designed coiled coil peptides. Covalent conjugation of the cationic peptides triggered rapid destabilization of membrane integrity and release of encapsulated species. The release was inhibited when introducing complementary peptides as a result of heterodimerization and folding into coiled coils. The degree of inhibition was shown to be dictated by the coiled coil peptide heterodimer dissociation constants, and liposomal release could be reactivated by a heterodimer exchange to render the membrane bound peptide free and thus membrane active. The possibility to tune the permeability of lipid membranes using highly specific peptide folding dependent interactions delineates a new possible approach for further development of responsive liposome-based drug delivery systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Researcher 4 16%
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 32%
Chemistry 4 16%
Engineering 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,798,290
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Langmuir
#3,217
of 14,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,420
of 326,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langmuir
#28
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,041 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.