↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of non-invasive measurement of tissue pH using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility of non-invasive measurement of tissue pH using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring, September 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02077636
Pubmed ID
Authors

Babs R. Soller, Ronald H. Micheels, John Coen, Bhairavi Parikh, Ling Chu, Charles Hsi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 19%
Physics and Astronomy 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,557,888
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring
#15
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,648
of 30,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.