↓ Skip to main content

Perineural invasion in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: role of immunohistochemistry, anatomical site, and the high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor TrkA

Overview of attention for article published in Human Pathology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perineural invasion in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: role of immunohistochemistry, anatomical site, and the high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor TrkA
Published in
Human Pathology, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.05.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noah Frydenlund, Dominick A. Leone, Brendon Mitchell, Ossama Abbas, Jagdish Dhingra, Meera Mahalingam

Abstract

Perineural invasion (PNI) has been recently added to the American Joint Committee on Cancer cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) staging criteria as a high-risk tumor characteristic and is purportedly more common in cSCCs of the head and neck (H&N). Expression of the high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor TrkA has been shown to be associated with PNI in noncutaneous neoplasms. Given this, we sought to ascertain the incidence of PNI in cSCCs using double immunostaining (DIS) and to investigate PNI's relationship with TrkA and established histopathologic prognosticators. Fifty-seven cSCCs from the H&N and 53 from non-H&N areas were immunohistochemically analyzed for PNI (DIS with S-100 and p63) and TrkA expression. Comparing H&N versus non-H&N areas, using hematoxylin and eosin, PNI was detected in 11% versus 6% cases, respectively, and, using DIS, in 23% versus 15%, respectively, with significant disagreement between both methods (κ = 0.47; P = .002). There was a 2.33-fold increase in PNI detection with DIS compared to hematoxylin and eosin (95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.87; P = .02). TrkA expression was 1.96 times more frequently observed in cSCCs from the H&N compared to those from non-H&N areas (P = .01). Regardless of site, TrkA expression was associated with decreased degree of differentiation (odds ratio, 6.46; P = .0006) and high-risk morphologic variants (odds ratio, 6.53; P = .002) but not significantly associated with PNI (P = .33). Increased PNI detection with DIS underscores the adjunctive utility of immunohistochemistry in microstaging. Significantly more common TrkA expression in cSCCs of the H&N argues in favor of heterogeneity among SCCs from different anatomical sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Pathology
#2,475
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,544
of 281,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Pathology
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.