↓ Skip to main content

Secondary processes during tantalum electrodeposition in molten salts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, July 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Secondary processes during tantalum electrodeposition in molten salts
Published in
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, July 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01092611
Authors

L. P. Polyakova, E. G. Polyakov, A. I. Sorokin, P. T. Stangrit

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 83%
Materials Science 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2006.
All research outputs
#7,557,888
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
#188
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,539
of 18,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.