↓ Skip to main content

Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, October 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
344 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, October 1998
DOI 10.1007/s001670050105
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Höher, H. D. Möller, F. H. Fu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Unknown 108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 12 11%
Other 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 46%
Engineering 10 9%
Sports and Recreations 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,116
of 2,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,232
of 32,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them