Title |
Direct comparison of infrared and ultraviolet wavelength matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry of proteins
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, January 1998
|
DOI | 10.1016/s1044-0305(97)00236-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shufang Niu, Wenzhu Zhang, Brian T. Chait |
Abstract |
In an effort to gain an understanding of the processes governing matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI), we made a direct comparison of ultraviolet (UV)- and infrared (IR)-MALDI linear time-of-flight mass spectra of proteins obtained from the same samples and matrices (on the same sample surface), using two different lasers, each having short duration (< 10-ns) pulses, i.e., a tunable wavelength Nd:yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) pumped optical parametric oscillator laser operating at 2.94 microns and a Nd:YAG laser operating at 355 nm. We observed that (1) the IR-MALDI and UV-MALDI spectra of a given protein from the same matrix were strikingly similar; (2) protein ions produced by IR-MALDI experienced less fragmentation than those produced by UV-MALDI; and (3) photochemical adducts produced during UV-MALDI were absent in IR-MALDI. These results lead us to speculate on the mechanisms for the ionization process in UV- and IR-MALDI. Because photons with a wavelength of approximately 3 microns are unlikely to effect electronic excitation of the matrix at the irradiance used for MALDI we propose that ionization in IR-MALDI occurs as a natural consequence of the solid-to-gas phase transition induced by the IR irradiation, and involves proton transfer reactions in the intermediate phase between solid and gas. The strikingly similar UV- and IR-MALDI mass spectra leads us to the additional proposal that ionization in UV-MALDI may also be a natural consequence of the phase transition and that electronic excitation may not play a primary role in the ionization process. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 24% |
Researcher | 11 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 32 | 55% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |