| Title |
Using intermediate objects to improve the efficiency of visual search
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, April 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01421203 |
| Authors |
Lambert E. Wixson, Dana H. Ballard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Russia | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 17 | 71% |
| Engineering | 4 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2004.
All research outputs
#7,557,888
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#399
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,710
of 23,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them