↓ Skip to main content

Pathological factors contributing to crossed cerebellar diaschisis in cerebral gliomas: a study combining perfusion, diffusion, and structural MR imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Pathological factors contributing to crossed cerebellar diaschisis in cerebral gliomas: a study combining perfusion, diffusion, and structural MR imaging
Published in
Neuroradiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00234-018-2015-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoxue Liu, Jianrui Li, Qiang Xu, Dante Mantini, Peng Wang, Yuan Xie, Yifei Weng, Chiyuan Ma, Kangjian Sun, Zhiqiang Zhang, Guangming Lu

Abstract

To investigate imaging features of crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) in cerebral gliomas, and its underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Thirty-three pre-surgical patients with cerebral gliomas and 33 healthy controls underwent arterial spin-labeling, diffusion tensor imaging, and high-resolution T1-weighted imaging using MRI, in order to estimate cerebral blood flow (CBF), white matter integrity, and lesion volume, respectively. Asymmetry indices of CBF in the cerebellum were used for evaluating the level of CCD in the patients. These indices were correlated with clinical variables (lesion size and position, tumor histological grade, and CBF asymmetry) and diffusion tensor imaging parameters (fractional anisotropy and number of fibers in the cortico-ponto-cerebellar pathway and across the cerebral hemispheres), respectively. The patients showed decreased CBF in the cerebellar hemisphere contralateral to the supratentorial tumor, and increased CBF asymmetry in the cerebellum (both P < 0.05). CCD levels in high-grade gliomas were higher than those of low-grade gliomas (P < 0.05). CCD levels were negatively correlated with the size of the supratentorial lesions, and positively correlated with FA asymmetry in the cerebral fibers (both P < 0.05). CCD in cerebral gliomas was specifically associated with tumor histological grade, lesion size, and white matter impairments in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the tumor. The findings implicated that observing CCD might have potential for assisting grading diagnosis of cerebral gliomas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Psychology 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,611,191
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#920
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,821
of 327,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.