↓ Skip to main content

Rules Versus Principles in Psychotherapy: Implications of the Quest for Universal Guidelines in the Movement for Empirically Supported Treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Rules Versus Principles in Psychotherapy: Implications of the Quest for Universal Guidelines in the Movement for Empirically Supported Treatments
Published in
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10879-005-0807-3
Authors

Heidi M. Levitt, Robert A. Neimeyer, Daniel C. Williams

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 33 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Professor 7 19%
Other 6 17%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 83%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
#74
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,796
of 59,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them