↓ Skip to main content

Clinical anatomy of cardiac veins, Vv. cardiacae

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, June 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Clinical anatomy of cardiac veins, Vv. cardiacae
Published in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, June 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf02086601
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. von Lüdinghausen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 24%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
#117
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,517
of 12,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them