↓ Skip to main content

Source water, phenology and growth of two tropical dry forest tree species growing on shallow karst soils

Overview of attention for article published in Trees, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Source water, phenology and growth of two tropical dry forest tree species growing on shallow karst soils
Published in
Trees, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00468-013-0878-9
Authors

Héctor Estrada-Medina, Louis S. Santiago, Robert C. Graham, Michael F. Allen, Juan José Jiménez-Osornio

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 48%
Environmental Science 12 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 8%
Chemistry 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#111
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,130
of 200,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.