| Title |
Comparative biosequence metrics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, January 1981
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01733210 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. F. Smith, M. S. Waterman, W. M. Fitch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 35% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,496,648
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#90
of 1,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#557
of 28,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them