↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacogenetic Phenotyping and Genotyping

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacogenetic Phenotyping and Genotyping
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00003088-199426010-00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank J. Gonzalez, Jeffrey R. Idle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2010.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#682
of 1,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,958
of 196,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#271
of 628 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 628 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.